Translator for HPLC HINTS and TIPS for Chromatographers

Saturday, December 23, 2023

HPLC SOLVENT COMPRESSIBILITY - REVISITED

 Twelve years ago I published a short article here (HPLC PUMP SOLVENT COMPRESSIBILITY VALUES) which described the importance of setting the correct solvent compressibility values in the HPLC pump's table. Developing HPLC methods which exhibit smooth, stable baselines, with little measurable signal artifacts (e.g. spikes, noise, oscillation) and minimal pressure fluctuations help insure reliable, repeatable methods. Taking steps to insure that the LC pump operates is setup properly for the method are part of following good chromatography fundamentals

Over the past month I consulted for three different clients who needed help in troubleshooting various "pump stability problems". In all three cases, each HPLC system showed extreme pump pressure cycling, cavitation, noise and instability over time. Pressure fluctuations of 10% (or in one case, 10-30% Ripple values) were observed in several different HPLC methods that were used. One of the very first areas to check for problems with pump pressure instability is mobile phase degassing.  

Proper operation of the HPLC pump requires that efficient degassing of all mobile phases is performed before the liquids enter the pump head. 

Failure to properly degas liquids often results in pump cavitation, check valve sticking and baseline instability. An Inline vacuum degasser or continuous Helium sparing should be used to degas all mobile phase solution for use in HPLC (not sonication or vacuum filtration which perform poorly to solve degassing issues). 

In one of the three cases, the HPLC degasser was found to be broken and long overdue for service. Cleaning and servicing the degasser cured the problem and the method that once showed pressure ripple of >10% now shows no baseline disturbances and very low ripple of ~0.1% at ~ 70 bars system pressure. 

Before I was called in to assist each client, the clients had replaced numerous parts, including: pump seals, check valves, mixers, solvent frits and still had the same baseline instability issues (no change). As recommended by me, two of the clients had their very old degassers cleaned and serviced (as they were long overdue for service), but still had some baseline and pump instability (servicing the degassers improved the baselines, but the pump was not running as it should). In both cases, the cause for the remaining pump instability was quickly identified by me on-site (many problems can be quickly diagnosed on-site).

  • The client had incompatible solvent compressibility values stored as part of their HPLC methods. This resulted in huge baseline disturbances, spikes, cavitation and occasional loss of prime. 
One of the clients normally ran methods containing high percentages of ACN (with some water) for their sample methods, but a few months earlier had switched to running with gradients containing high percentages of methanol. The solvent compressibility values stored in their system were appropriate for WATER, but they never updated them when they used the same method file to run samples in mostly methanol solutions (which need different compressibility values). Though they all had been using HPLC for many years, they had not received basic HPLC instrument training to know how to adjust and optimize these and other important instrument settings for EACH method (they were overwriting each new method, a common new user mistake, when making changes). Once we changed the method's solvent compressibility value to a more compatible one (in their case, for methanol), the baseline smoothed out in just a few minutes and all of the pressure instability issues went away (*they had replaced several thousand dollars worth of perfectly functioning parts trying to solve this issue before I arrived). Professional training in how to use and operate any HPLC instrument should always include how to set and optimize the compressibility value(s). Make sure you know how to incorporate the correct value in each new method that you create. Always spend up-front time to optimize each method for the application before you use it to analyze real samples. The initial time spent getting everything to run smoothly and reliably will improve overall accuracy plus save money and time.
  • Note: In a low-pressure HPLC single-head pumping system with multi-position solvent selector valve (e.g. Most ternary or quaternary systems) one value is allowed, but in a true, dual-head binary pumping system each of the two pump-heads may have a separate field to input the solvent compressibility values.

The importance of inputting the correct and applicable solvent compressibility value(s) into the pump's settings, for each solvent used is one of many steps in creating an optimized HPLC method. There are no universal values, but the instrument manufacturer will have included a generic value in the pump's compressibility settings field. Should you use this generic value?  What are the chances that a randomly selected value used as a 'place holder' in the software is the correct value for your method?  Just as with flow rate, solvent composition, run time, stroke volume, wavelength etc., entering (and saving) the correct solvent compressibility value into EACH method helps to optimize the pumping performance. You will want to select an appropriate value FOR EACH AND EVERY HPLC METHOD YOU CREATE and use (and be sure to save the method with a unique name). Start by loading your HPLC method into the system, then look at the solvent compressibility value(s) used. Are they correct? Change the value(s) shown to values that are appropriate for your method. It is OK to experiment and try different values (we encourage it!). Monitor the S/N levels of the baseline noise for comparison. The instrument manufacturer should provide a table of suggestion solvent compressibility values for use with their system [For HP/Agilent systems, you can see an example table at the link I provided in the first paragraph of this article or review the operator's manual for more information].

Saturday, July 22, 2023

HPLC Injection Volume: What Should I Dilute It In and How Much Sample Can I Inject?

HPLC Injection Volume and Solution Tips: For best results, the choice of injection solution and amount must be carefully selected. Successful HPLC methods shall observe good chromatography fundamentals. 

  • How much sample can I inject on my column? The HPLC injection volume must be carefully selected to avoid overloading the column and also maintain good quality peak shape (Good peak shapes, Gaussian are ideal, are preferred for accurate integration and quantitation). Too large an injection volume and the peak shape may be broad and result in co-elution, column fouling and/or poor reproducibility. Too low an injection volume may lead to no-detection, poor reproducibility and/or inaccurate integration. Choose an appropriate Injection Volume (and concentration) that is appropriate for the COLUMN and Method used (their is no universal answer as they depend on YOUR column and method). Start, by learning what your HPLC column's "dead" volume is (Determining the HPLC Column Volume Link here).  As a general guideline, keep the volume low and inject no more than ~ 1% of the column's dead volume (maximum for most columns is ~ 1 to 2 %, but if the peak shape is excellent, sometimes up to 3% is possible). The actual capacity will be different for different column support types, dimensions etc, so it is best not to guess. Use a volume that is within the injector's most accurate range (for most auto-injector's, the optimal range may be found away from the extreme limits, often between 20% and 80% of capacity, but please refer to the documentation for your injector for specifics). Once an acceptable volume has been identified, then you can vary the concentration to find the best sample load for your analysis conditions.
    • NOTE: To find the true and correct answer to "How Much Can I Inject (Load) onto my column" requires that you conduct a 'Loading Study' [To run a loading study you will prepare a batch of samples of increasing concentrations levels which can be individually injected, then evaluated on YOUR column, using YOUR method. This is how we determine the MAXIMUM amount possible which can be loaded and still provide good quality results. All other methods are just estimates.
  • What should I dilute my sample in? Dilute samples using the mobile phase solution (in the case of gradient compositions, use the "initial" mixture to avoid precipitation). Your sample(s) should be FULLY dissolved in the mobile phase and not in a solution that is chemically incompatible with the flow path or is "stronger" in elution strength than the initial mobile phase. The diluent should not interfere with the analysis or loading of the sample onto the column. Example: If your method is 100% aqueous, then do not inject the sample(s) in a solution that contains organic solvent (i.e. ACN). *Peak fronting, splitting, precipitation and/or distortion (broad shapes) may result from using a diluent that is stronger than the mobile phase.
  • My sample solution is cloudy or has "stuff" floating in it. ONLY Inject sample solutions which are 100% fully dissolved, in-solution. Injecting samples which have precipitated out of the solution OR which are not fully dissolved in solution (100%) may result in line obstruction, clogging, column fouling and invalid data collection/results. Take the time to find a mobile phase that your sample fully dissolves in to avoid problems. Troubleshooting and repairing an HPLC system for clogs and/or column contamination is both time consuming and expensive.
  • Filter sample solutions to prevent clogs and reduce column fouling. Make sure the sample is first fully dissolved in the solution and do not use a 'filtering' step as a cheat to remove undissolved sample. Filtering is used to protect the system from particles that we can not easily observe which may clog the system. Please refer to the article; "Syringe Filter Selection for HPLC or LC/MS samples"; for more information on filter selection.
  • Improve Injector reproducibility: Leave the vial cap slightly loose so it does not make a full seal. *This prevents a vacuum forming inside the vial, resulting in injection volumes which may be lower than the selected volume. "Loose caps" can greatly improve accuracy and reproducibility when larger OR multiple volumes are injected from the same vial. Additionally, if the total sample vial volume is very small (i.e. ~ 200 ul), utilize a vial insert of the correct dimensions and type for improved accuracy. When using vial inserts, check that the needle height is correct for the vial insert used.  Do not use the entire sample volume! Never use more than 90% of the vial volume or air may be aspirated resulting in invalid data collection.
  • Prevent sample carryover problems by regularly inspecting and servicing your HPLC injector (Manual valve and Autoinjector maintenance tips will be found at this LINK). Replace common wear parts such as rotary valve seals and needle seats on a regular basis (Do not "clean" and re-use seals). Carryover troubleshooting Tips will be found at this LINK.
  •  Calibration Volumes for Quantitation: When creating a new calibration table for a group of standards, use the SAME VOLUME for each standard and vary the concentration ("calibration level") only with each vial. As we have seen, injection volume is a variable which may change peak shape and integration accuracy. If you inject the same volume of liquid for all standards (and samples too), then you remove this variable. Using the SAME injection volume for all standards and samples helps to reduce problems. *Note: Thought it may not be approved, if you thoroughly test varying the injection volume across the range used for the calibration to demonstrate no undesirable changes to peak shape, loss of resolution/separation, and it is reproducible and accurate for the analysis method, then you can vary injection volume. Link to: HPLC Calibration Article.
     

 

Please note that these are general guidelines only and the mode of chromatography (e.g. NP/RP/HILIC/SEC), scale (prep vs. analytical) and/or specific method used must be optimized for best results. Follow these basic guidelines to prevent analysis problems, prolong column and system lifetimes and increase reproducibility and accuracy.

Saturday, April 9, 2022

Agilent Quaternary Pump (e.g. G1311A ) "Secret" Operator Tip to FLUSH the HPLC Pump in 1/2 the time!

One of the most popular "tips" taught in our Agilent 1100 and 1200-series HPLC training classes shows users how to speed up the daily priming and flushing process of the Quaternary Pump. Many people use these pumps without taking advantage of the Quaternary pump's higher flow capability. If you are not currently using the higher 10mL/min flow rate capability offered by this pump (vs. the Binary pump's 5 mL/min), then you are missing out on a free time saving feature. Please read on to learn how to use this feature.

Based on the HP 1050 pump and introduced in 1995 as the "1100-series" version, the G1311  "Quat" pumps are one of the most popular research grade HPLC pumps found in laboratories today. They are extremely reliable, rugged, easy to operate and service. The Quat pump is driven by an easily accessible, single pump head with an in-series, servo controlled dual plunger and Multi-channel Gradient Valve ('MCGV') for 4-channel solvent proportioning with an active inlet valve (known as the 'AIV', first used in the HP 1050 pump and the reason for this pump's high reliability. No more "sticking" inlet valve issues!). Unlike the Agilent Binary pump (G1312), which uses two separate dual plunger pumps (2-channel) at up to 5.0 mL/min (maximum), the Quat pump offers an extended flow range, up to 10.0 mL/min (maximum). However, most users are not aware of this or do not know how to utilize this higher flow rate feature because the Quat pump defaults to a maximum flow rate of 5 mL/min at initialization. The ability to program the pump to operate at flow rates greater than 5 mL/min requires a "trick" to activate it (which apparently is a secret as we rarely encounter customers who are aware of how to use it). 

Let me share with you why you would want to use this feature, why the feature is hidden to most and of course HOW TO ACTIVATE IT on the Quat pump.

  • Q: Why would you want to run the pump at 5 to 10 mL/min? Semi-prep columns can be run within this flow rate range, but a more common reason to operate at 10 mL/min is for daily system start-up. Anytime you replace or change the mobile phase bottle/solution OR when you startup the HPLC system (each day) one of the very first things you need to do is prime or flush each of the mobile phase channels, one-at-a-time through the system to waste. Air bleeds into the system when it is not used and this procedure primes the lines and pump head with fresh mobile phase preparing it for use. The system's flow path is directed to waste (via the open, prime-purge valve) during this step so back-pressure is not a concern. The higher the flow rate you can use for this flushing step, the sooner you can complete it. If you run the pump at 10 mL/min vs 5 mL/min, then flushing can be completed in half the time. This is especially useful if you have a model G1322A degasser module installed as the internal volume of each degassing channel in the G1322A is 10-12 mLs, requiring extended flushing times (4x channels = 30+ mLs flush per channel) before moving on to the next channel.
  • Q: Why does the Quat pump initialize with a reduced, 5 mL/min maximum flow rate? The Quat pump was designed to meet two different operating pressure ranges. From 0 to 5 mL/min the permitted operating pressure range is 0 - 40 MPa (0 - 400 bar). Above 5 mL/min, the operating pressure range is reduced, 0 - 20 MPa (0 - 200 bar). As most analytical chromatography is performed at flow rates below 5 mL/min, the system initializes using the more practical, 0 - 400 bar range, limiting flow rates to 5 mL/min maximum. The default maximum pressure field is set to 400 bars. You should always change the maximum pressure value from 400 bars to a more realistic maximum pressure (lower value) for your method. Use a maximum value that is appropriate for your own method. *The only time you will want to set it to the maximum value is when conducting a Pump Pressure/Leak test (it must be set to max pressure for testing).
  • Q: When I try and enter a pump flow rate larger than 5 mL/min, the system does not accept it. How do I program the pump to increase the flow rate past 5 mL to 10 mL/min? In order for the system to accept a flow rate of greater than 5 mL/min, you must FIRST set the maximum pressure limit to a value that is 200 bars or less (within the allowed "0 - 20 MPa (0 - 200 bar)" range). Once the maximum pressure limit has been reduced in the method, the system will then allow you to enter a higher flow rate such as 9.999 mL/min (10 mL/min). As long as the maximum pressure alarm is set within this window (200 or less), the pump will allow flow rates above 5 mL/min to be used. Now you can program the pump to flush lines or prime the system at twice the speed of the Binary pump equipped systems (10 mL/min).

Please share this "trick" with other users of the G1311A, G1311B, G1311C versions of this pump so they can maximize their time and productivity. Let us know if you find this tip useful.


Saturday, January 29, 2022

Adjusting the HPLC Gradient Time For Changes in Column Diameter and/or Length (same particle size)

Changes to the column diameter (to scale the method up or down) can be calculated. For an established HPLC method using the same support type (same exact material and particle size) where the column dimensions and flow rate are known. Note: If only the diameter changes and the lengths remain the same (proper linear flow rates used in both cases), then the resulting gradient times will also be similar. If the column lengths change, then the gradient time will change.

Changes to the Gradient Time (Tg2) used for a second column which has a different diameter, "Dc2" and/or length, "Lc2" can be calculated if you know: 

  • Tg1 [Time, of initial Gradient on Column #1];
  • Tg2 [Time of second Gradient on Column #2];
  • Fc1 [Flow Rate of Column 1] ;
  • Fc2 [Flow Rate of Column 2];
  • Dc1 [Diameter of Column 1]
  • Dc2 [Diameter of Column 2];
  • Lc1 [Length of Column 1];
  • Lc2 [Length of Column 2].

        Tg2 = Tg1 x (Fc1 / Fc2) x (Dc22 / Dc12) x (Lc2 / Lc1)

 

Example: Initial Method utilizes a 4.6 x 150 mm, 5u column run at 1.00 mL/min with a 10 minute gradient program and we wish to transfer this gradient method over to a column with a 2.1 mm diameter (ID) x 100 mm column run at 200 ul/min.

   Tg2 = 10 x (1 / 0.2) x (2.12 / 4.62) x (100 /150)

   Tg2 = 10 x (5) x (4.41/21.16) x (0.67) 

   Tg2 =  50 x 0.208 x 0.67

   Tg2 =  6.97 minutes.

The gradient time used on the 2.1 x 100 mm column run at 0.200 mL/min would be ~ 7 minutes (vs 10 minutes on the 4.6 x 150 mm column at 1 mL/min).

 

NOTE: A note about optimized flow rates. If the Column PARTICLE SIZE changes, esp from greater than 3.5 u to less than 3.5 u, then the optimized flow rate may also change too. Please refer to my article;